AASCX vs. ATGAX
AASCX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AASCX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AASCX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund | 1.60% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AASCX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AASCX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
AASCX
ATGAX
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AASCX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AASCX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 58.33 | -57.95 |
Drawdowns
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASCX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | 0.00% | -56.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | 0.00% | -10.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AASCX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 9.26% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 9.26% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 9.26% | +11.60% |
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AASCX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund | 13.01% | 14.98% | 9.22% | 1.54% | 3.15% | 12.54% | 3.54% | 2.92% | 12.94% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, AASCX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for AASCX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer