AAPX vs. XTAP
AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPX returned 97.74% vs 21.00% for XTAP. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
AAPX vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 10.96% return.
AAPX
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 97.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 21.23% | -4.95% | 56.69% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 17.58% | 13.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPX and XTAP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.50 |
AAPX vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPX
XTAP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AAPX
XTAP
Basic Materials
AAPX
-
XTAP
Communication Services
AAPX
-
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
AAPX
-
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
AAPX
-
XTAP
Energy
AAPX
-
XTAP
Financial Services
AAPX
-
XTAP
Healthcare
AAPX
-
XTAP
Industrials
AAPX
-
XTAP
Real Estate
AAPX
-
XTAP
Utilities
AAPX
-
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPX vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
AAPX
XTAP
AAPX vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 2.22 | -0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 14.82 | -11.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 78.70 | -70.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 4.50 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
AAPX vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -22.13% | -36.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -1.42% | -28.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -0.21% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -3.45% | -15.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 0.27% | +12.39% |
Volatility
AAPX vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that AAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPX | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 1.10% | +10.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.05% | 3.16% | +28.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.99% | 4.70% | +40.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 14.54% | +40.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 14.41% | +40.21% |
AAPX vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPX vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPX and XTAP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPX has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 97.74% vs 21.00% for XTAP. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 97.74% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPX and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer