PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. NVDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPX vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 22.31% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 24.68% return.


AAPX

1D
0.89%
1M
18.76%
YTD
22.31%
6M
12.90%
1Y
100.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDU

1D
3.97%
1M
21.27%
YTD
24.68%
6M
26.89%
1Y
90.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
22.31%-4.95%56.69%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
24.68%33.65%235.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and NVDU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.24

AAPX vs. NVDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAPX
NVDU

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AAPX
100.0%
NVDU
100.0%

Basic Materials

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Communication Services

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Consumer Cyclical

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Consumer Defensive

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Energy

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Financial Services

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Healthcare

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Industrials

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Real Estate

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Utilities

AAPX

-

NVDU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXNVDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.15

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

4.90

+3.06

AAPX vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXNVDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.34

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.17

-0.65

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and NVDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXNVDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-67.27%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-42.27%

+12.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-15.08%

+12.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-18.83%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

18.50%

-5.84%

Volatility

AAPX vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 10.31%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 24.76%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPXNVDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

24.76%

-14.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.00%

50.62%

-18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.98%

67.91%

-22.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.58%

91.02%

-36.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.58%

91.02%

-36.44%

AAPX vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPX vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than NVDU's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.54%0.67%21.46%0.00%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
4.65%5.68%16.85%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPX and NVDU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDU has higher volatility (24.76%) compared to AAPX (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 100.47% vs 90.38% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 10.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 100.47% return vs 90.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.54% for AAPX.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 1.04% for NVDU.

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPX and NVDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer