AAPX vs. MVLL
AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AAPX is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPX returned 97.74% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
AAPX vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.
AAPX
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 97.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 21.23% | 7.69% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | -10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPX and MVLL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025 | 0.32 |
AAPX vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPX
MVLL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AAPX
MVLL
Basic Materials
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Communication Services
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Defensive
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Energy
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Financial Services
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Healthcare
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Industrials
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Real Estate
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Utilities
AAPX
-
MVLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPX vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
AAPX
MVLL
AAPX vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.63 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 25.11 | -21.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 52.27 | -44.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 9.23 | -7.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 3.33 | -2.82 |
Drawdowns
AAPX vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, roughly equal to the maximum MVLL drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -59.02% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -48.93% | +18.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | 0.00% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -22.42% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 23.46% | -10.80% |
Volatility
AAPX vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 11.21%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 60.78% | -49.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.05% | 96.08% | -64.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.99% | 133.11% | -88.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 139.63% | -85.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 139.63% | -85.01% |
AAPX vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPX vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPX and MVLL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to AAPX (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs MVLL's -59.02%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 97.74% for AAPX. On fees, AAPX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 11.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 97.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 1.50% for MVLL.
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPX and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer