PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPU vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPU achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.


AAPU

1D
-3.04%
1M
24.81%
YTD
23.16%
6M
11.93%
1Y
104.11%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
2.92%
1M
216.81%
YTD
936.86%
6M
1,369.93%
1Y
6,074.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPU
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
23.16%-2.91%22.65%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
936.86%558.51%-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPU and MULL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

0.20

AAPU vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAPU
MULL

Technology

100.0%
66.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AAPU
100.0%
MULL
66.7%

Basic Materials

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Communication Services

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Consumer Cyclical

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Consumer Defensive

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Energy

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Financial Services

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Healthcare

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Industrials

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Real Estate

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Utilities

AAPU

-

MULL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPU
AAPU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AAPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPUMULLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-44.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.89

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

116.34

-112.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

390.40

-381.68

AAPU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPU Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPU and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPUMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

46.71

-44.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

7.45

-7.00

Drawdowns

AAPU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPU drawdown since its inception was -58.61%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPU and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPUMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.61%

-72.29%

+13.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-53.09%

+24.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

0.00%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-20.62%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

15.79%

-3.81%

Volatility

AAPU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) is 10.71%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that AAPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPUMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

55.41%

-44.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.79%

105.59%

-73.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.66%

132.38%

-87.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.93%

136.22%

-87.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.93%

136.22%

-87.29%

AAPU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

AAPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AAPU
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
6.90%8.66%14.58%2.32%0.79%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.04%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPU and MULL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to AAPU (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPU dropped -58.61% vs MULL's -72.29%.

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 104.11% for AAPU. On fees, AAPU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, AAPU has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 104.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

AAPU has the higher dividend yield at 6.90%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AAPU and 1.50% for MULL.

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPU and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer