PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPR vs. APRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPR vs. APRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPR achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than APRH's 4.49% return.


AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRH

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.07%
YTD
4.49%
6M
4.02%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPR vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAPR and APRH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.63

The correlation between AAPR and APRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPR vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

APRH
APRH Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPR vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPRAPRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.90

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.12

6.48

+5.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.99

22.02

+40.97

AAPR vs. APRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is higher than the APRH Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPR and APRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPRAPRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18

3.18

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

1.70

+0.03

Drawdowns

AAPR vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPR drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, roughly equal to the maximum APRH drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPR and APRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPRAPRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-5.87%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.81%

-1.21%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.08%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-0.21%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

0.36%

-0.20%

Volatility

AAPR vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) at 0.55%. This indicates that AAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPRAPRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.55%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

1.98%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

2.47%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.81%

4.56%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

4.56%

+0.25%

AAPR vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAPR and APRH have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

AAPR vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison

AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAPR and APRH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPR has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to APRH (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPR dropped -5.99% vs APRH's -5.87%.

On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 9.83% vs 7.82% for APRH. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, APRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPR and APRH have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

APRH has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 3.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPR and APRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer