PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPR vs. AMZP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAPR vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAPR vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPR achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than AMZP's -12.57% return.


AAPR

1D
0.28%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.60%
6M
3.29%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZP

1D
0.81%
1M
1.15%
YTD
-12.57%
6M
-8.92%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPR vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAPR vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPR vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPRAMZPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

0.26

+1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

0.59

+2.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.08

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.39

+2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.47

1.01

+15.45

AAPR vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPR and AMZP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPRAMZPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

0.26

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.60

+1.01

Correlation

The correlation between AAPR and AMZP is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AAPR vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.22%.


Drawdowns

AAPR vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPR drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum AMZP drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPR and AMZP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPRAMZPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-27.36%

+21.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-23.64%

+19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.73%

+18.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-6.14%

+5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

9.06%

-8.43%

Volatility

AAPR vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) is 0.66%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that AAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAPRAMZPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

10.84%

-10.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

22.04%

-20.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.41%

31.80%

-26.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

26.50%

-21.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

26.50%

-21.56%