PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAOTX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAOTX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's 6.17% return.


AAOTX

1D
0.82%
1M
1.47%
6M
7.42%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*

LTIUX

1D
0.50%
1M
0.43%
6M
4.29%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AAOTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A
10.58%20.36%15.20%21.16%-19.94%16.85%46.68%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.17%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%38.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AAOTX and LTIUX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.96

The correlation between AAOTX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAOTX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAOTX
AAOTX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AAOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AAOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAOTXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.95

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

8.46

+0.41

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAOTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAOTX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAOTX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAOTX and LTIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAOTXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.57%

-49.65%

+22.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-6.57%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-11.08%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-24.23%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.56%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-6.67%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.51%

+0.71%

Volatility

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) at 3.14%. This indicates that AAOTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAOTXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

3.14%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

7.67%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

9.16%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

11.91%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

12.42%

+2.69%

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAOTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAOTX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

AAOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than LTIUX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAOTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A
3.98%4.41%2.52%1.71%3.67%1.34%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.50%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AAOTX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAOTX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to LTIUX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAOTX dropped -27.57% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

AAOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAOTX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer