AAMI vs. KO
AAMI (Acadian Asset Management Inc) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. AAMI operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, AAMI returned 28.46%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for KO. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AAMI vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAMI achieves a 84.63% return, which is significantly higher than KO's 26.97% return.
AAMI
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 18.33%
- 6M
- 56.58%
- YTD
- 84.63%
- 1Y
- 119.33%
- 3Y*
- 59.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.06%
KO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.36M | $34.64M | $36.97M | |
| $1.49B | $1.47B | $1.44B |
AAMI vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc | 84.63% | 78.64% | 37.70% | -6.72% | -19.45% | 33.00% | 93.85% | -0.80% | -30.71% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 26.97% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 14.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAMI and KO is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.17 |
The correlation between AAMI and KO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAMI:
$3.08B
KO:
$376.85B
AAMI:
$2.83
KO:
$3.32
AAMI:
30.51
KO:
26.39
AAMI:
4.38
KO:
7.54
AAMI:
33.56
KO:
10.45
AAMI:
$706.40M
KO:
$50.13B
AAMI:
$794.80M
KO:
$31.02B
AAMI:
$198.00M
KO:
$19.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAMI vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
AAMI
KO
AAMI vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAMI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 4.17 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | 9.09 | +5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAMI vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAMI drawdown since its inception was -75.23%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMI and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAMI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.23% | -68.23% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.20% | -7.87% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | -15.50% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.45% | -17.27% | -34.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.67% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -16.06% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 3.60% | +3.61% |
Volatility
AAMI vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 9.09%. This indicates that AAMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAMI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 9.09% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.39% | 15.06% | +15.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.68% | 18.66% | +24.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.31% | 16.64% | +18.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.19% | 18.42% | +23.77% |
Dividends
AAMI vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
AAMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than KO's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc | 0.25% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 1.19% | 3.91% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.37% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
AAMI vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadian Asset Management Inc and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAMI vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
AAMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 184.10M and revenue of 192.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.7%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 8.42B and revenue of 13.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.
AAMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 39.60M and revenue of 192.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.67B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
AAMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 27.30M and revenue of 192.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 4.43B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in a net margin of 33.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAMI and KO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAMI has higher volatility (12.38%) compared to KO (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMI dropped -75.23% vs KO's -68.23%.
AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAMI and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer