AAMCX vs. QMLFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AAMCX (Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, AAMCX returned 5.64%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for QMLFX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAMCX charges 2.70%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.

Performance

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAMCX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 20.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMCX has underperformed QMLFX with an annualized return of 5.64%, while QMLFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.59% annualized return.

AAMCX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 17.90%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 5.64%

QMLFX

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 20.58%
• 6M: 18.12%
• 1Y: 40.42%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	8.62%	9.86%	10.16%	12.53%	-19.02%	14.36%	4.78%	9.61%	-6.22%	10.64%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	20.58%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	13.22%	37.81%	26.08%	-13.48%	16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AAMCX and QMLFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.85

The correlation between AAMCX and QMLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AAMCX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAMCX

AAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 50
AAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
AAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAMCX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.72	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.24	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.31	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.92	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	11.06	+1.01

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAMCX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAMCX drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum QMLFX drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMCX and QMLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAMCX	QMLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.73%	-36.59%	+13.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-10.07%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-27.21%	+11.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.73%	-34.07%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.73%	-36.59%	+13.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.29%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-12.50%	+6.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.48%	3.56%	-2.08%

Volatility

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) is 3.99%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that AAMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAMCX	QMLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	12.06%	-8.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.91%	17.95%	-10.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.07%	23.01%	-12.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.92%	20.63%	-8.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.33%	21.25%	-9.92%

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAMCX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAMCX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

AAMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than QMLFX's 1.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	2.21%	2.40%	3.64%	0.00%	0.00%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	11.86%	3.78%	1.20%	0.00%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.14%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAMCX and QMLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AAMCX and QMLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AAMCX or QMLFX?

QMLFX has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to AAMCX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMCX dropped -22.73% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.