AAMCX vs. GTAIX
AAMCX (Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund) and GTAIX (Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, AAMCX returned 5.27%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for GTAIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAMCX charges 2.70%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for GTAIX.
Performance
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAMCX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than GTAIX's 14.34% return.
AAMCX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.97%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
GTAIX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund | 8.62% | 9.86% | 10.16% | 12.53% | -19.02% | 14.36% | 4.78% | 9.61% | -5.53% |
GTAIX Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund | 14.34% | 13.49% | 8.39% | 15.59% | -14.49% | 9.25% | -0.10% | 16.08% | -8.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAMCX and GTAIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between AAMCX and GTAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAMCX vs. GTAIX — Risk / Return Rank
AAMCX
GTAIX
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAMCX | GTAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.54 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 5.37 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 22.43 | -10.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAMCX drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum GTAIX drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMCX and GTAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAMCX | GTAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -24.25% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -4.51% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -11.89% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.73% | -19.43% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.46% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -4.80% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 1.08% | +0.40% |
Volatility
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Volatility Comparison
Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) at 3.40%. This indicates that AAMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAMCX | GTAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 3.40% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 7.27% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 8.59% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.92% | 10.79% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.33% | 11.51% | -0.18% |
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAMCX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAMCX vs. GTAIX - Dividend Comparison
AAMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than GTAIX's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund | 2.21% | 2.40% | 3.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.86% | 3.78% | 1.20% |
GTAIX Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund | 4.83% | 5.82% | 3.38% | 2.69% | 1.65% | 2.35% | 0.82% | 1.77% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAMCX and GTAIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAMCX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to GTAIX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMCX dropped -22.73% vs GTAIX's -24.25%.
GTAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAMCX and GTAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer