PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AALGX vs. VTWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AALGX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than VTWAX's 12.29% return.


AALGX

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.61%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.08%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
11.37%

VTWAX

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.90%
YTD
12.29%
6M
13.02%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AALGX
Thrivent Global Stock Fund
10.96%20.49%27.79%21.71%-19.38%20.37%14.46%14.22%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
12.29%22.43%16.43%21.85%-18.02%18.17%16.67%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AALGX and VTWAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.98

The correlation between AALGX and VTWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AALGX vs. VTWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AALGX
AALGX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWAX
VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AALGXVTWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.05

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.78

13.64

-0.86

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AALGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VTWAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AALGX and VTWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AALGXVTWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.38

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.70

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.77

-0.32

Drawdowns

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AALGX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than VTWAX's maximum drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALGX and VTWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AALGXVTWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-34.20%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.64%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.65%

-16.43%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.65%

-26.40%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.76%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-5.30%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.15%

-0.09%

Volatility

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) is 3.30%, while Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that AALGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AALGXVTWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.64%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

9.84%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

12.39%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

15.72%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

18.20%

+0.13%

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AALGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWAX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

AALGX vs. VTWAX - Dividend Comparison

AALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than VTWAX's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AALGX
Thrivent Global Stock Fund
9.96%11.05%23.12%5.51%3.21%14.40%3.01%12.68%9.82%1.00%1.15%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.57%1.80%1.92%2.06%2.17%1.79%1.64%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, AALGX and VTWAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWAX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to AALGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AALGX dropped -55.28% vs VTWAX's -34.20%.

VTWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AALGX and VTWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer