AALGX vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
AALGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 15, 1987. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | -1.71% | 20.49% | 27.79% | 21.71% | -19.38% | 20.37% | 14.46% | 22.71% | -8.75% | 10.85% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 2.85% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AALGX achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AALGX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
AALGX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AALGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AALGX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
AALGX
VMVFX
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AALGX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.93 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.34 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.29 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 6.16 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AALGX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.93 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.94 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.73 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.79 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between AALGX and VMVFX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
AALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.24%, more than VMVFX's 9.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | 11.24% | 11.05% | 23.12% | 5.51% | 3.21% | 14.40% | 3.01% | 12.68% | 9.82% | 1.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.70% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AALGX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALGX and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AALGX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -33.09% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -7.96% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.65% | -13.02% | -21.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | -33.09% | -2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -4.98% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.56% | -2.84% | -7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.66% | +0.85% |
Volatility
AALGX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.93%. This indicates that AALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AALGX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 2.93% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 4.99% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 10.06% | +7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 10.76% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 12.49% | +5.82% |