PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AALGX vs. EPSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AALGX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than EPSYX's 17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AALGX has outperformed EPSYX with an annualized return of 11.78%, while EPSYX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


AALGX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
9.12%
6M
8.11%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
11.78%

EPSYX

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.47%
YTD
17.87%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.66%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AALGX
Thrivent Global Stock Fund
9.12%20.49%27.79%21.71%-19.38%20.37%14.46%22.71%-8.75%10.85%
EPSYX
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund
17.87%22.09%15.38%12.50%-5.37%17.40%-1.38%23.19%-9.23%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AALGX and EPSYX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2005

0.85

The correlation between AALGX and EPSYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AALGX vs. EPSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AALGX
AALGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

EPSYX
EPSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EPSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AALGXEPSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.53

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

4.34

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

16.96

-5.77

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AALGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the EPSYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AALGX and EPSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AALGX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than EPSYX's maximum drawdown of -48.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALGX and EPSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AALGXEPSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-48.92%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-7.22%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.65%

-12.95%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.65%

-18.92%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

-36.35%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-1.60%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-6.89%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.84%

+0.26%

Volatility

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) at 3.93%. This indicates that AALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AALGXEPSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

3.93%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

8.38%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.04%

10.64%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

13.10%

+5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

14.82%

+3.46%

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AALGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EPSYX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

AALGX vs. EPSYX - Dividend Comparison

AALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.13%, more than EPSYX's 6.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AALGX
Thrivent Global Stock Fund
10.13%11.05%23.12%5.51%3.21%14.40%3.01%12.68%9.82%1.00%1.15%0.00%
EPSYX
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund
6.75%8.24%10.13%2.71%2.64%2.66%2.74%6.87%9.87%2.24%3.18%9.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AALGX and EPSYX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AALGX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to EPSYX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AALGX dropped -55.28% vs EPSYX's -48.92%.

EPSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AALGX and EPSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer