PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AALG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AALG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AALG achieves a -14.63% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's 2.68% return.


AALG

1D
-0.42%
1M
-3.68%
6M
-17.57%
YTD
-14.63%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
-1.53%
1M
6.62%
6M
-12.61%
YTD
2.68%
1Y
45.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AALG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AALG and RTXG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AALG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AALG
AALG Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AALG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AALG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AALG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AALGRTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.19

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.21

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

2.83

-2.37

AALG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AALG Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the RTXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AALG and RTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AALG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AALG drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AALGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.19%

-37.49%

-26.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.19%

-37.49%

-26.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.08%

-21.51%

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.63%

-10.33%

-14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.31%

15.96%

+15.35%

Volatility

AALG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) has a higher volatility of 25.61% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) at 16.72%. This indicates that AALG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AALGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.61%

16.72%

+8.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.09%

38.95%

+33.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.14%

50.54%

+45.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.75%

49.92%

+45.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.75%

49.92%

+45.83%

AALG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AALG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AALG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

AALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than RTXG's 6.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AALG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AALG has higher volatility (25.61%) compared to RTXG (16.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AALG dropped -64.19% vs RTXG's -37.49%.

On 1-year performance, RTXG leads with 45.05% vs 14.54% for AALG. On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 16.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RTXG has performed better with a 45.05% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AALG.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.20%, compared with 1.82% for AALG.

Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AALG and 0.75% for RTXG.

RTXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AALG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer