AALG vs. IFED
AALG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AALG is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AALG charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
AALG vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AALG achieves a -32.60% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.52% return.
AALG
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- 28.23%
- YTD
- -32.60%
- 6M
- -26.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AALG vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AALG Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF | -32.60% | 34.84% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.52% | 4.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AALG and IFED is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AALG vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
AALG
IFED
AALG vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AALG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.65 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
AALG vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AALG drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALG and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AALG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -22.36% | -41.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.39% | -5.50% | -34.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -5.84% | -19.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility
AALG vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AALG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.00% | 16.21% | +78.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.00% | 19.88% | +75.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.00% | 19.88% | +75.12% |
AALG vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
AALG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AALG vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
AALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AALG Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF | 2.31% | 1.56% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AALG and IFED have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AALG.
AALG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AALG and 0.45% for IFED.
Find the right allocation for AALG and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer