AAICX vs. FIKGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX).

AAICX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Apr 4, 2024. FIKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C	-8.09%	39.54%	32.77%
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z	7.52%	45.43%	8.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAICX achieves a -8.09% return, which is significantly lower than FIKGX's 7.52% return.

AAICX

• 1D: 4.85%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: -8.09%
• 6M: -10.87%
• 1Y: 44.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIKGX

• 1D: 7.13%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 88.96%
• 3Y*: 38.99%
• 5Y*: 27.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAICX has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKGX's 0.62% expense ratio.

AAICX

Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C

FIKGX

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

AAICX vs. FIKGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAICX

AAICX Risk / Return Rank: 79
AAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
AAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FIKGX

FIKGX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FIKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FIKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FIKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FIKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FIKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAICX	FIKGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.26	-0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.86	-0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	5.22	-2.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	19.77	-12.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FIKGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAICX and FIKGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAICX	FIKGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	2.26	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.85	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between AAICX and FIKGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Dividend Comparison

AAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than FIKGX's 6.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C	7.00%	6.44%	4.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z	6.20%	6.67%	0.00%	3.14%	3.08%	4.19%	4.54%	1.08%	19.72%

Drawdowns

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAICX drawdown since its inception was -29.07%, smaller than the maximum FIKGX drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAICX and FIKGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAICX	FIKGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.07%	-45.98%	+16.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.87%	-17.09%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.88%	-8.55%	-5.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-10.00%	+4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.94%	4.51%	+1.43%

Volatility

AAICX vs. FIKGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) is 9.47%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a volatility of 12.80%. This indicates that AAICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAICX	FIKGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.47%	12.80%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.85%	25.66%	-7.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.86%	40.19%	-11.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.96%	38.15%	-10.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.96%	38.39%	-10.43%