PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAICX vs. FDTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAICX achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's 12.36% return.


AAICX

1D
-1.34%
1M
11.29%
YTD
25.81%
6M
24.55%
1Y
60.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDTRX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.69%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.72%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
18.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAICX
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C
25.81%39.54%32.77%
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
12.36%18.97%14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AAICX and FDTRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024

0.93

The correlation between AAICX and FDTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAICX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAICX
AAICX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTRX
FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAICXFDTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.46

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

4.56

+5.96

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAICX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the FDTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAICX and FDTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAICXFDTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

1.46

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.75

+1.03

Drawdowns

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAICX drawdown since its inception was -29.07%, smaller than the maximum FDTRX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAICX and FDTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAICXFDTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.07%

-48.10%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-20.39%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.14%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-9.14%

+4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

6.52%

-0.62%

Volatility

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison

Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) at 4.99%. This indicates that AAICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAICXFDTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.99%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.82%

15.86%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

20.41%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.41%

26.21%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

24.61%

+2.80%

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAICX has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAICX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison

AAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than FDTRX's 9.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAICX
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C
5.12%6.44%4.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDTRX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6
9.24%10.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.36%0.00%0.71%2.80%1.71%3.44%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AAICX and FDTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAICX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FDTRX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAICX dropped -29.07% vs FDTRX's -48.10%.

AAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAICX and FDTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer