AAICX vs. ALBAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAICX (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C) and ALBAX (Alger Growth & Income Fund) are both mutual funds - AAICX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Alger, while ALBAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past year, AAICX returned 60.29% vs 34.45% for ALBAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAICX charges 1.66%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ALBAX.

Performance

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAICX achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than ALBAX's 13.35% return.

AAICX

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 11.29%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 24.55%
• 1Y: 60.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALBAX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 3.79%
• YTD: 13.35%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 22.55%
• 5Y*: 14.78%
• 10Y*: 15.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C	25.81%	39.54%	32.77%
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund	13.35%	19.89%	13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AAICX and ALBAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024	0.78

The correlation between AAICX and ALBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AAICX vs. ALBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAICX

AAICX Risk / Return Rank: 69
AAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ALBAX

ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 86
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAICX	ALBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.89	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.99	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	4.43	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.52	20.11	-9.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAICX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ALBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAICX and ALBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAICX	ALBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.89	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	0.67	+1.11

Drawdowns

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAICX drawdown since its inception was -29.07%, smaller than the maximum ALBAX drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAICX and ALBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAICX	ALBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.07%	-40.56%	+11.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.87%	-7.86%	-10.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.44%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.08%	-7.34%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	1.73%	+4.17%

Volatility

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Volatility Comparison

Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) at 3.01%. This indicates that AAICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAICX	ALBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	3.01%	+2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.82%	9.17%	+7.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.34%	12.06%	+10.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.41%	15.51%	+11.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	17.25%	+10.16%

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAICX has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ALBAX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAICX vs. ALBAX - Dividend Comparison

AAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than ALBAX's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C	5.12%	6.44%	4.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund	0.80%	0.74%	1.08%	0.98%	1.24%	4.17%	2.55%	5.00%	6.75%	2.35%	1.56%	3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAICX and ALBAX in my portfolio?

AAICX and ALBAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAICX or ALBAX?

AAICX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to ALBAX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAICX dropped -29.07% vs ALBAX's -40.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.