AAGIY vs. IBN
AAGIY (AIA Group Ltd ADR) and IBN (ICICI Bank Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — AAGIY in Insurance - Life, IBN in Banks - Regional. Over the past 10 years, AAGIY returned 7.42%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for IBN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAGIY vs. IBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAGIY achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly higher than IBN's -12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AAGIY has underperformed IBN with an annualized return of 7.42%, while IBN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
AAGIY
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 1.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
IBN
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -12.45%
- 6M
- -15.02%
- 1Y
- -21.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
AAGIY vs. IBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAGIY AIA Group Ltd ADR | -2.75% | 46.33% | -12.94% | -20.35% | 12.33% | -16.82% | 18.71% | 30.08% | -2.70% | 56.35% |
IBN ICICI Bank Limited | -12.45% | 0.57% | 26.32% | 9.80% | 11.27% | 33.57% | -1.52% | 47.01% | 6.25% | 44.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAGIY and IBN is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2011 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AAGIY and IBN has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
AAGIY:
$103.12B
IBN:
$94.54B
AAGIY:
$4.94
IBN:
$149.87
AAGIY:
7.94
IBN:
0.17
AAGIY:
0.69
IBN:
0.01
AAGIY:
1.73
IBN:
0.03
AAGIY:
2.38
IBN:
0.03
AAGIY:
$59.82B
IBN:
$3.13T
AAGIY:
$52.76B
IBN:
$2.18T
AAGIY:
$15.90B
IBN:
$774.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAGIY vs. IBN — Risk / Return Rank
AAGIY
IBN
AAGIY vs. IBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) and ICICI Bank Limited (IBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAGIY | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.83 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | -0.82 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | -1.60 | +5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAGIY | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | -1.05 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.36 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.49 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.23 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
AAGIY vs. IBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAGIY drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, smaller than the maximum IBN drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAGIY and IBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAGIY | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.79% | -86.09% | +30.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.06% | -26.20% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.61% | -26.20% | -18.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.99% | -26.24% | -25.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.79% | -55.05% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.60% | -23.60% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -28.01% | +13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 13.30% | -8.25% |
Volatility
AAGIY vs. IBN - Volatility Comparison
AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) at 6.49%. This indicates that AAGIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAGIY | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 6.49% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 16.50% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 20.38% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 23.61% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.13% | 31.68% | -2.55% |
Dividends
AAGIY vs. IBN - Dividend Comparison
AAGIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than IBN's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAGIY AIA Group Ltd ADR | 2.51% | 2.26% | 4.91% | 2.29% | 1.70% | 1.69% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 2.17% | 3.26% | 1.00% |
IBN ICICI Bank Limited | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.57% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.43% | 0.79% | 1.98% | 4.01% |
Financials
AAGIY vs. IBN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AIA Group Ltd ADR and ICICI Bank Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAGIY vs. IBN - Profitability Comparison
AAGIY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 16.98B and revenue of 16.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
IBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ICICI Bank Limited reported a gross profit of 623.06B and revenue of 846.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.
AAGIY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 4.37B and revenue of 16.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.
IBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ICICI Bank Limited reported an operating income of 208.13B and revenue of 846.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
AAGIY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported a net income of 3.70B and revenue of 16.98B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
IBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ICICI Bank Limited reported a net income of 147.55B and revenue of 846.14B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAGIY and IBN have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAGIY has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to IBN (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAGIY dropped -55.79% vs IBN's -86.09%.
AAGIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAGIY and IBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer