AAG.V vs. 2099.HK

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

AAG.V (Aftermath Silver Ltd) and 2099.HK (China Gold International Resources) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — AAG.V in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, 2099.HK in Other Precious Metals & Mining. Over the past 10 years, AAG.V returned 29.04%/yr vs 27.73%/yr for 2099.HK. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aftermath Silver Ltd (AAG.V) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AAG.V is traded in CAD, while 2099.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2099.HK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAG.V achieves a -40.19% return, which is significantly lower than 2099.HK's -17.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AAG.V having a 29.04% annualized return and 2099.HK not far behind at 27.73%.

AAG.V

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -20.99%
• YTD: -40.19%
• 6M: -39.05%
• 1Y: -4.48%
• 3Y*: 40.65%
• 5Y*: 4.65%
• 10Y*: 29.04%

2099.HK

• 1D: 5.97%
• 1M: -15.66%
• YTD: -17.57%
• 6M: -15.83%
• 1Y: 79.75%
• 3Y*: 65.92%
• 5Y*: 50.64%
• 10Y*: 27.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAG.V Aftermath Silver Ltd	-40.19%	151.76%	63.46%	-0.00%	-31.58%	-73.05%	193.75%	638.46%	-53.57%	180.00%
2099.HK China Gold International Resources	-17.57%	268.71%	34.03%	52.16%	22.81%	94.79%	52.70%	-26.79%	-26.87%	1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AAG.V and 2099.HK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2011	0.09

The correlation between AAG.V and 2099.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAG.V

AAG.V Risk / Return Rank: 43
AAG.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AAG.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
AAG.V Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AAG.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
AAG.V Martin Ratio Rank: 41

2099.HK

2099.HK Risk / Return Rank: 74
2099.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
2099.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
2099.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 72
2099.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
2099.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aftermath Silver Ltd (AAG.V) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAG.V	2099.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.35	-1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	1.99	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.24	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	1.71	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.16	4.27	-4.43

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAG.V Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the 2099.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAG.V and 2099.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAG.V drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than 2099.HK's maximum drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAG.V and 2099.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAG.V	2099.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.20%	-90.33%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.67%	-48.07%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.67%	-51.42%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.14%	-51.42%	-22.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.80%	-84.02%	-6.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.20%	-44.98%	-42.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.84%	-45.12%	-45.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.54%	19.05%	+8.49%

Volatility

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Volatility Comparison

Aftermath Silver Ltd (AAG.V) has a higher volatility of 24.52% compared to China Gold International Resources (2099.HK) at 21.56%. This indicates that AAG.V's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2099.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAG.V	2099.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.52%	21.56%	+2.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.10%	45.60%	+20.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.30%	61.20%	+31.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.39%	54.94%	+33.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.62%	53.87%	+55.75%

Dividends

AAG.V vs. 2099.HK - Dividend Comparison

AAG.V has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2099.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
2099.HK China Gold International Resources	2.99%	0.40%	0.00%	8.71%	8.56%	4.44%
AAG.V Aftermath Silver Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAG.V and 2099.HK in my portfolio?

AAG.V and 2099.HK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.