PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AACTX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund (AACTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AACTX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AACTX has outperformed FRQAX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while FRQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.


AACTX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.85%
YTD
4.87%
6M
5.25%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
7.14%

FRQAX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.52%
YTD
3.95%
6M
4.14%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AACTX
American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.87%13.91%8.63%10.06%-11.29%10.28%10.61%15.25%-3.03%12.46%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.95%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AACTX and FRQAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.94

The correlation between AACTX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AACTX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AACTX
AACTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AACTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AACTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AACTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AACTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AACTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund (AACTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AACTXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.95

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

12.54

-0.51

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AACTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AACTX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AACTXFRQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.46

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.48

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.88

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Drawdowns

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AACTX drawdown since its inception was -46.28%, which is greater than FRQAX's maximum drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AACTX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AACTXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.28%

-38.22%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-3.46%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-5.27%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.18%

-17.24%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.18%

-17.24%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-4.57%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.81%

+0.34%

Volatility

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund (AACTX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that AACTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AACTXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.67%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

3.43%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

4.15%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

5.56%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

5.33%

+2.43%

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AACTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

AACTX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

AACTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than FRQAX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AACTX
American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund
7.44%7.80%5.18%3.25%3.95%6.30%4.22%3.96%4.16%2.52%2.99%4.12%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.82%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AACTX and FRQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AACTX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AACTX dropped -46.28% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AACTX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer