AAAU vs. AETH
AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) and AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price, while AETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise. AAAU is passively managed, while AETH is actively managed. Over the past year, AAAU returned 20.08% vs -34.00% for AETH. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AETH.
Performance
AAAU vs. AETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a -6.96% return, which is significantly higher than AETH's -16.81% return.
AAAU
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -12.45%
- YTD
- -6.96%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 17.06%
- 10Y*
- —
AETH
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -20.82%
- YTD
- -16.81%
- 1Y
- -34.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAU vs. AETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -6.96% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 11.61% |
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -16.81% | -0.11% | 31.76% | 33.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAU and AETH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAAU vs. AETH — Risk / Return Rank
AAAU
AETH
AAAU vs. AETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAAU | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.83 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.67 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | -0.98 | +2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAAU vs. AETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -26.29%, smaller than the maximum AETH drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and AETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAU | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.29% | -51.08% | +24.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -51.08% | +24.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.60% | -48.22% | +22.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -25.64% | +19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.10% | 34.76% | -23.66% |
Volatility
AAAU vs. AETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) is 6.65%, while Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) has a volatility of 10.62%. This indicates that AAAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAAU | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 10.62% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.97% | 25.47% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.73% | 42.00% | -14.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 53.87% | -35.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 53.87% | -36.65% |
AAAU vs. AETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AETH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAAU vs. AETH - Dividend Comparison
AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.89% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAAU and AETH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AETH has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to AAAU (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAU dropped -26.29% vs AETH's -51.08%.
On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 20.08% vs -34.00% for AETH. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 20.08% return vs -34.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.
AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.
AAAU is categorized as Gold, while AETH is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AAAU and 0.90% for AETH.
AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAAU and AETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer