AAAMX vs. ACIHX
AAAMX (American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio) and ACIHX (American Century Growth Fund G Class) are both mutual funds - AAAMX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by American Century, while ACIHX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Over the past 3 years, AAAMX returned 9.78%/yr vs 23.07%/yr for ACIHX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAAMX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for ACIHX.
Performance
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAMX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than ACIHX's 8.95% return.
AAAMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
ACIHX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAMX American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio | 4.39% | 11.63% | 6.87% | 10.81% | -2.35% |
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 8.95% | 16.26% | 27.35% | 44.64% | -6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAMX and ACIHX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AAAMX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAAMX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank
AAAMX
ACIHX
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAAMX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.34 | 1.83 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.41 | 2.48 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.32 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.75 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 5.88 | +6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAAMX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.83 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.02 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAMX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum ACIHX drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAMX and ACIHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAMX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.03% | -24.00% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.72% | -16.40% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.33% | -24.00% | +17.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -4.89% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 4.87% | -3.81% |
Volatility
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) is 1.71%, while American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that AAAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAAMX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 3.44% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.38% | 11.92% | -7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.48% | 15.71% | -10.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.67% | 21.05% | -13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 21.05% | -13.46% |
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAMX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAAMX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison
AAAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than ACIHX's 14.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAMX American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio | 2.93% | 5.13% | 3.20% | 2.10% | 2.85% | 2.28% |
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 14.64% | 15.95% | 5.65% | 4.61% | 2.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAAMX and ACIHX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACIHX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to AAAMX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAMX dropped -19.03% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.
AAAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAAMX and ACIHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer