PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAA vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAA vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAA achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.28% return.


AAAA

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.11%
YTD
12.38%
6M
12.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFUL

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.45%
YTD
3.28%
6M
3.33%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAA vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAAA
Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF
12.38%9.90%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.28%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAA and MFUL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAA vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAA

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAA vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAAA vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAAAMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.41

0.01

+2.41

Drawdowns

AAAA vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAA drawdown since its inception was -7.83%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAA and MFUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAAMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-16.41%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.46%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-9.50%

+8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

AAAA vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAAMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

3.93%

+7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.25%

4.24%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.25%

4.24%

+7.01%

AAAA vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAA vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

AAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than MFUL's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AAAA
Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF
0.79%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.01%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAA and MFUL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.79% for AAAA.

They also come from different issuers: Amplius and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AAAA and 1.10% for MFUL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAA and MFUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer