AAAA vs. INCM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AAAA (Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAAA returned 21.98% vs 12.86% for INCM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAAA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.

Performance

AAAA vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAA achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than INCM's 6.71% return.

AAAA

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 9.20%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INCM

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -0.51%
• 6M: 4.48%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 10.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAA vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAA Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF	10.99%	10.11%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	6.71%	6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAA and INCM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.54

The correlation between AAAA and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AAAA vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAA

AAAA Risk / Return Rank: 74
AAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
AAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
AAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 81

INCM

INCM Risk / Return Rank: 89
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAA vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAA	INCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.37	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.37	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.45	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	4.05	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.21	16.31	-4.10

AAAA vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAA and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAAA vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAA drawdown since its inception was -7.83%, roughly equal to the maximum INCM drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAA and INCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAA	INCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-7.84%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-3.19%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-0.51%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-1.07%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.79%	+1.01%

Volatility

AAAA vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 2.07%. This indicates that AAAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAA	INCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	2.07%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	4.34%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	5.45%	+6.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.73%	7.24%	+4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.73%	7.24%	+4.49%

AAAA vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAA vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

AAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than INCM's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAAA Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF	1.29%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.16%	4.96%	5.06%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAA and INCM in my portfolio?

AAAA and INCM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAA or INCM?

AAAA has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to INCM (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAA dropped -7.83% vs INCM's -7.84%.

Which ETF is better, AAAA or INCM?

On 1-year performance, AAAA leads with 21.98% vs 12.86% for INCM. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAAA or INCM?

Over the 1-year period, AAAA has performed better with a 21.98% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAA or INCM?

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAA or INCM?

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.29% for AAAA.

What is the main difference between AAAA and INCM?

They also come from different issuers: Amplius and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AAAA and 0.38% for INCM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.