PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAA vs. CVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAA vs. CVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAA achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly lower than CVY's 16.32% return.


AAAA

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.13%
6M
11.37%
YTD
13.31%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.36%

CVY

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.34%
6M
9.40%
YTD
16.32%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
6.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$338.29K$277.48K$186.80K
$90.97K$91.55K$113.66K

AAAA vs. CVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAAA and CVY is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.52

The correlation between AAAA and CVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAA vs. CVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAAA
AAAA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CVY
CVY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAAA vs. CVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAAACVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.98

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

10.22

+2.13

AAAA vs. CVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the CVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAA and CVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAAA vs. CVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAA drawdown since its inception was -7.83%, smaller than the maximum CVY drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAA and CVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAACVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-66.86%

+59.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-7.43%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.28%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-10.32%

+9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.16%

-0.28%

Volatility

AAAA vs. CVY - Volatility Comparison

Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) at 2.85%. This indicates that AAAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAACVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

2.85%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

7.80%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

10.74%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

16.04%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.85%

19.46%

-7.61%

AAAA vs. CVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CVY's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAA vs. CVY - Dividend Comparison

AAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than CVY's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAA
Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF
1.26%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.09%3.99%4.07%4.41%5.18%2.37%3.40%3.22%4.44%3.94%4.50%5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAA and CVY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAAA has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to CVY (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAA dropped -7.83% vs CVY's -66.86%.

On 1-year performance, AAAA leads with 23.21% vs 22.03% for CVY. On fees, AAAA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, CVY has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAAA has performed better with a 23.21% return vs 22.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAAA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.

CVY has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 1.26% for AAAA.

They also come from different issuers: Amplius and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AAAA and 1.21% for CVY.

CVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAA and CVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer