PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAA vs. BRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAA vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAA achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than BRLN's 1.35% return.


AAA

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*

BRLN

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.23%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAA vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AAA
AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF
1.86%4.92%6.85%8.94%2.33%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
1.35%5.38%7.49%13.42%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between AAA and BRLN is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAA vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAA
AAA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAA vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAABRLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.98

2.56

+6.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.78

9.95

+17.82

AAA vs. BRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAA Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the BRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAA and BRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAABRLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.68

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

2.19

-0.26

Drawdowns

AAA vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAA drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, smaller than the maximum BRLN drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAA and BRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAABRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-3.85%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.60%

-2.00%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.40%

-3.85%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.21%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.31%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

0.51%

-0.32%

Volatility

AAA vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) is 0.74%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) has a volatility of 0.81%. This indicates that AAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAABRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.81%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

2.24%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30%

3.06%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

3.73%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.15%

3.73%

-1.58%

AAA vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAA vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

AAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than BRLN's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AAA
AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF
4.90%5.11%6.17%6.11%2.78%1.06%0.32%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.35%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAA and BRLN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRLN has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to AAA (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAA dropped -2.63% vs BRLN's -3.85%.

On 3-year performance, BRLN leads with 7.36% vs 6.50% for AAA. On fees, AAA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BRLN has performed better with a 7.36% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 4.90% for AAA.

AAA is categorized as CLO, while BRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Alternative Access Funds LLC and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AAA and 0.55% for BRLN.

AAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAA and BRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer