PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
A200.AX vs. VAS.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than VAS.AX's -0.24% return.


A200.AX

1D
-1.26%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.27%
6M
2.63%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*

VAS.AX

1D
-2.23%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
1.27%10.31%11.57%12.00%-0.56%17.90%1.16%22.87%-3.83%
VAS.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
-0.24%10.66%11.40%12.00%-1.68%17.04%1.90%23.77%-4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between A200.AX and VAS.AX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2018

0.98

The correlation between A200.AX and VAS.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

A200.AX
A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VAS.AX
VAS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VAS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


A200.AXVAS.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

0.47

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

1.20

+0.36

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A200.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the VAS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A200.AX and VAS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


A200.AXVAS.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

0.33

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.56

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.58

-0.02

Drawdowns

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, roughly equal to the maximum VAS.AX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and VAS.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


A200.AXVAS.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-35.75%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-8.56%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-13.23%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-15.18%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-5.60%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-4.70%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

3.33%

-0.04%

Volatility

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) is 4.17%, while Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that A200.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


A200.AXVAS.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.71%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

9.88%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

12.02%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

12.81%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

14.47%

+0.82%

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

A200.AX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VAS.AX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

A200.AX vs. VAS.AX - Dividend Comparison

A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than VAS.AX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
3.40%3.33%3.13%3.75%6.35%2.98%2.54%3.61%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAS.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
3.19%3.17%3.22%3.71%7.19%3.01%2.56%4.12%4.84%3.76%4.14%4.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, A200.AX and VAS.AX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, A200.AX is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

A200.AX is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VAS.AX.

A200.AX tracks Solactive Australia 200 Index, while VAS.AX tracks S&P/ASX 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for A200.AX and 0.07% for VAS.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for A200.AX and VAS.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer