PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
A200.AX vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

A200.AX vs. REET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET).

A200.AX and REET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. A200.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Australia 200 Index. It was launched on May 7, 2018. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. Both A200.AX and REET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

A200.AX vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

A200.AX vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF		-1.44%10.31%11.57%12.00%-0.56%17.90%1.16%22.87%-3.83%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF		-2.18%0.13%12.98%10.36%-19.09%40.20%-18.34%25.00%3.24%
Different Trading Currencies

A200.AX is traded in AUD, while REET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REET values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly higher than REET's -2.18% return.

A200.AX

1D
0.27%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
11.92%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
—

REET

1D
0.54%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-2.18%
6M
-3.95%
1Y
-2.83%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
4.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Australia 200 ETF

iShares Global REIT ETF

Often compared with A200.AX:
A200.AX vs. IVVA200.AX vs. DHHF.AXA200.AX vs. VOOA200.AX vs. IOOA200.AX vs. BHPA200.AX vs. VTVA200.AX vs. VASGX
Often compared with REET:
REET vs. VNQREET vs. VNQIREET vs. XLREREET vs. USRTREET vs. SCHHREET vs. RWOREET vs. FREL

A200.AX vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

A200.AX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF

Return for Risk

A200.AX vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
A200.AX
A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A200.AX vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

A200.AXREETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

-0.21

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

-0.19

+1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.98

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

-0.19

+1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

-0.46

+4.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

A200.AX vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A200.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the REET Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A200.AX and REET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

A200.AXREETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

-0.21

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.32

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.27

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.41

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between A200.AX and REET is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

A200.AX vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than REET's 3.65% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF		3.24%3.33%3.13%3.75%6.35%2.98%2.54%3.61%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF		3.65%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Drawdowns

A200.AX vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, roughly equal to the maximum REET drawdown of -36.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and REET.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

A200.AXREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-44.59%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-11.70%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-32.11%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.59%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-7.39%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-9.91%

+5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.79%

+0.09%

Volatility

A200.AX vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 3.84%. This indicates that A200.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

A200.AXREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

3.84%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

8.23%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

13.78%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

14.48%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

16.68%

-1.37%