A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

A200.AX (Betashares Australia 200 ETF) and QOZ.AX (BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - A200.AX is a fund fund tracking the Solactive Australia 200 Index, while QOZ.AX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, A200.AX returned 7.68%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for QOZ.AX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. A200.AX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QOZ.AX.

Performance

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than QOZ.AX's 5.37% return.

A200.AX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: —

QOZ.AX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 5.37%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: 10.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	1.27%	10.31%	11.57%	12.00%	-0.56%	17.90%	1.16%	22.87%	-3.83%
QOZ.AX BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF	5.37%	16.94%	10.61%	11.45%	5.52%	17.17%	-0.13%	18.60%	-4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between A200.AX and QOZ.AX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2018	0.91

The correlation between A200.AX and QOZ.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

A200.AX

A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 16
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

QOZ.AX

QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 41
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	A200.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	1.48	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	2.08	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.27	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.03	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	5.66	-4.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A200.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A200.AX and QOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	A200.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	1.48	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.80	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.67	-0.10

Drawdowns

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, roughly equal to the maximum QOZ.AX drawdown of -37.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and QOZ.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	A200.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.55%	-37.05%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-8.60%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.22%	-12.95%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.79%	-14.87%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-4.80%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-4.29%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	3.09%	+0.20%

Volatility

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) at 3.37%. This indicates that A200.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	A200.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.37%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	9.30%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	11.75%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	12.74%	-0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	14.70%	+0.59%

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

A200.AX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QOZ.AX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

A200.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than QOZ.AX's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	3.40%	3.33%	3.13%	3.75%	6.35%	2.98%	2.54%	3.61%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QOZ.AX BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF	3.63%	3.88%	4.58%	5.27%	7.24%	3.96%	3.30%	6.45%	6.59%	3.09%	5.46%	8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both A200.AX and QOZ.AX in my portfolio?

A200.AX and QOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, A200.AX or QOZ.AX?

On fees, A200.AX is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, A200.AX or QOZ.AX?

A200.AX is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QOZ.AX.

What is the main difference between A200.AX and QOZ.AX?

A200.AX tracks Solactive Australia 200 Index, while QOZ.AX tracks FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for A200.AX and 0.40% for QOZ.AX.