A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX
Compare and contrast key facts about Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX).
A200.AX and ARMR.AX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. A200.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Australia 200 Index. It was launched on May 7, 2018. ARMR.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2024. Both A200.AX and ARMR.AX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF | -1.44% | 10.31% | 0.70% |
ARMR.AX Betashares Global Defence ETF | 0.05% | 47.73% | 12.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ARMR.AX's 0.05% return.
A200.AX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- 11.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ARMR.AX
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -4.34%
- 1Y
- 28.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison
A200.AX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMR.AX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX — Risk / Return Rank
A200.AX
ARMR.AX
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| A200.AX | ARMR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.17 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.68 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.84 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 4.89 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| A200.AX | ARMR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.17 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.78 | -1.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between A200.AX and ARMR.AX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Dividend Comparison
A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than ARMR.AX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF | 3.24% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 3.75% | 6.35% | 2.98% | 2.54% | 3.61% | 1.40% |
ARMR.AX Betashares Global Defence ETF | 2.31% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than ARMR.AX's maximum drawdown of -14.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and ARMR.AX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| A200.AX | ARMR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.55% | -14.86% | -20.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -14.86% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | -14.86% | +7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -3.25% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 5.61% | -2.73% |
Volatility
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) is 4.95%, while Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that A200.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMR.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| A200.AX | ARMR.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 7.24% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 18.10% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 24.05% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 22.77% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 22.77% | -7.46% |