PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
-1.44%10.31%0.70%
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
0.05%47.73%12.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ARMR.AX's 0.05% return.


A200.AX

1D
0.27%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
11.92%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*

ARMR.AX

1D
-2.46%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

A200.AX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMR.AX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

A200.AX
A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMR.AX
ARMR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


A200.AXARMR.AXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.17

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.68

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.84

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

4.89

-1.14

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A200.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A200.AX and ARMR.AX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


A200.AXARMR.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.17

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.78

-1.23

Correlation

The correlation between A200.AX and ARMR.AX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Dividend Comparison

A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than ARMR.AX's 2.31% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
3.24%3.33%3.13%3.75%6.35%2.98%2.54%3.61%1.40%
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
2.31%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than ARMR.AX's maximum drawdown of -14.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and ARMR.AX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


A200.AXARMR.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-14.86%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-14.86%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-14.86%

+7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-3.25%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

5.61%

-2.73%

Volatility

A200.AX vs. ARMR.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) is 4.95%, while Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that A200.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMR.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


A200.AXARMR.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

7.24%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

18.10%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

24.05%

-10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

22.77%

-10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

22.77%

-7.46%