PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
9999.HK vs. 1810.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in NetEase Inc (9999.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 9999.HK achieves a -8.68% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -27.79% return.


9999.HK

1D
-0.50%
1M
6.90%
YTD
-8.68%
6M
-10.11%
1Y
-1.80%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*

1810.HK

1D
-0.70%
1M
-7.92%
YTD
-27.79%
6M
-33.66%
1Y
-47.69%
3Y*
37.49%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
9999.HK
NetEase Inc
-8.68%59.11%1.03%25.01%-25.97%7.53%14.11%
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp
-27.79%13.42%122.12%42.60%-42.12%-42.81%157.80%

Correlation

The correlation between 9999.HK and 1810.HK is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020

0.50

The correlation between 9999.HK and 1810.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

9999.HK
9999.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
9999.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
9999.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
9999.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
9999.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
9999.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

1810.HK
1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetEase Inc (9999.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


9999.HK1810.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.76

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.89

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

-1.47

+1.42

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 9999.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 9999.HK and 1810.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


9999.HK1810.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

-1.34

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.02

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.15

+0.05

Drawdowns

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 9999.HK drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, smaller than the maximum 1810.HK drawdown of -76.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9999.HK and 1810.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


9999.HK1810.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.95%

-76.06%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.83%

-53.38%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.15%

-53.38%

+20.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.29%

-70.66%

+17.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.14%

-52.82%

+32.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-42.07%

+20.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.86%

32.06%

-16.20%

Volatility

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

NetEase Inc (9999.HK) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) at 8.99%. This indicates that 9999.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


9999.HK1810.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.97%

8.99%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

26.15%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.27%

35.49%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.10%

44.16%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.09%

45.84%

+0.25%

Dividends

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison

9999.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while 1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
9999.HK
NetEase Inc
2.45%2.20%2.76%1.96%2.08%0.81%0.52%

Financials

9999.HK vs. 1810.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetEase Inc and Xiaomi Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


9999.HK and 1810.HK have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 9999.HK and 1810.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer