9888.HK vs. 1810.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK).

Performance

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
9888.HK Baidu Inc	-17.26%	59.01%	-28.77%	3.94%	-22.75%	-42.62%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-21.42%	13.42%	122.12%	42.60%	-42.12%	-26.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 9888.HK achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -21.42% return.

9888.HK

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -7.25%
• YTD: -17.26%
• 6M: -21.84%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: -9.26%
• 5Y*: -12.99%
• 10Y*: —

1810.HK

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -21.42%
• 6M: -44.66%
• 1Y: -30.68%
• 3Y*: 36.43%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

9888.HK

9888.HK Risk / Return Rank: 53
9888.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
9888.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
9888.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 51
9888.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
9888.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 10
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 13
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	9888.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	-0.72	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	-0.82	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.89	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	-0.87	+1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	-1.62	+2.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 9888.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 9888.HK and 1810.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	9888.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	-0.72	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	0.07	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.18	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between 9888.HK and 1810.HK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither 9888.HK nor 1810.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 9888.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.20%, smaller than the maximum 1810.HK drawdown of -76.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9888.HK and 1810.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	9888.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.20%	-76.06%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.21%	-48.66%	+14.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.08%	-71.83%	+5.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.83%	-48.66%	-8.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.51%	-41.92%	-9.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.71%	25.96%	-12.25%

Volatility

9888.HK vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baidu Inc (9888.HK) is 10.90%, while Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a volatility of 13.65%. This indicates that 9888.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	9888.HK	1810.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	13.65%	-2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.32%	26.82%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.17%	43.70%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.36%	44.02%	+7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.58%	45.98%	+5.60%

Financials