9888.HK vs. 0388.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK).

Performance

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
9888.HK Baidu Inc	-17.26%	59.01%	-28.77%	3.94%	-22.75%	-42.62%
0388.HK Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd	-1.30%	42.10%	13.85%	-18.41%	-24.22%	2.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 9888.HK achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly lower than 0388.HK's -1.30% return.

9888.HK

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -7.25%
• YTD: -17.26%
• 6M: -21.84%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: -9.26%
• 5Y*: -12.99%
• 10Y*: —

0388.HK

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: -1.30%
• 6M: -10.84%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: 7.76%
• 5Y*: -0.63%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

9888.HK

9888.HK Risk / Return Rank: 53
9888.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
9888.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
9888.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 51
9888.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
9888.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

0388.HK

0388.HK Risk / Return Rank: 57
0388.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
0388.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
0388.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
0388.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
0388.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baidu Inc (9888.HK) and Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	9888.HK	0388.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.55	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	0.89	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.13	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	0.95	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	2.26	-0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 9888.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the 0388.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 9888.HK and 0388.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	9888.HK	0388.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.55	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	-0.02	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.54	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between 9888.HK and 0388.HK is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Dividend Comparison

9888.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 0388.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
9888.HK Baidu Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
0388.HK Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd	3.16%	2.67%	2.81%	3.06%	2.26%	2.01%	1.58%	2.68%	2.86%	1.91%	2.77%	2.63%

Drawdowns

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 9888.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.20%, smaller than the maximum 0388.HK drawdown of -79.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9888.HK and 0388.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	9888.HK	0388.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.20%	-79.34%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.21%	-15.18%	-19.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.08%	-60.01%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.83%	-19.15%	-37.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.51%	-28.06%	-23.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.71%	7.16%	+6.55%

Volatility

9888.HK vs. 0388.HK - Volatility Comparison

Baidu Inc (9888.HK) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) at 7.93%. This indicates that 9888.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0388.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	9888.HK	0388.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	7.93%	+2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.32%	15.81%	+16.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.17%	28.37%	+18.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.36%	34.23%	+17.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.58%	30.55%	+21.03%

Financials