PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

8PSG.DE is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 19.48% return.


8PSG.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
2.72%
6M
5.46%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
2.31%
1M
3.14%
YTD
19.48%
6M
20.54%
1Y
43.12%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
24.84%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
2.72%48.98%34.29%9.43%7.00%3.81%5.65%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
19.48%9.72%50.98%55.05%-24.67%45.15%34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and XLKQ.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.02

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


8PSG.DEXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.72

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

7.13

-2.52

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSG.DE and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSG.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-40.10%

+21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-15.78%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-30.46%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-30.46%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-7.23%

-7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-8.03%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

6.04%

+0.50%

Volatility

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) is 5.09%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSG.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

8.21%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

15.47%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.14%

20.40%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

26.83%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

23.82%

-7.69%

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

8PSG.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSG.DE nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSG.DE and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

8PSG.DE is categorized as Gold, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. 8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 8PSG.DE and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSG.DE and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer