8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L
8PSG.DE (Invesco Physical Gold ETC) and IBTA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 8PSG.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while IBTA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 8PSG.DE returned 18.68%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for IBTA.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 8PSG.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTA.L.
Performance
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
8PSG.DE is traded in EUR, while IBTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than IBTA.L's 3.87% return.
8PSG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- YTD
- -5.74%
- 6M
- -6.86%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
IBTA.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- —
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8PSG.DE Invesco Physical Gold ETC | -5.74% | 48.98% | 44.76% | 0.00% | 8.62% | 3.81% | 12.94% | 20.91% | 2.90% | -10.19% |
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 3.87% | -7.16% | 10.94% | 1.08% | 2.21% | 6.80% | -5.36% | 5.96% | 6.16% | -11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between 8PSG.DE and IBTA.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017 | 0.10 |
The correlation between 8PSG.DE and IBTA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
8PSG.DE
IBTA.L
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 8PSG.DE | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.41 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | 3.88 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.21%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and IBTA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 8PSG.DE | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.21% | -15.63% | -38.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -4.07% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -10.85% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -12.61% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.00% | -4.51% | -17.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -6.63% | -17.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.48% | 1.48% | +8.00% |
Volatility
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 1.42%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 8PSG.DE | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 1.42% | +6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.34% | 4.34% | +17.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.08% | 6.02% | +27.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 7.46% | +11.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 7.24% | +14.60% |
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
8PSG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
8PSG.DE vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 8PSG.DE nor IBTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
8PSG.DE and IBTA.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 8PSG.DE.
8PSG.DE is categorized as Gold, while IBTA.L is Government Bonds. 8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 8PSG.DE and 0.07% for IBTA.L.
Find the right allocation for 8PSG.DE and IBTA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer