PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

8PSG.DE is traded in EUR, while GOLB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GOLB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than GOLB.L's -4.86% return.


8PSG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.94%
YTD
-5.74%
6M
-6.86%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
11.21%

GOLB.L

1D
1.40%
1M
-11.52%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-10.10%
1Y
58.21%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
-5.74%48.98%44.76%0.00%8.62%3.81%4.64%
GOLB.L
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
-4.86%126.00%19.56%2.46%-3.88%-9.10%71.64%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and GOLB.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020

0.57

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and GOLB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLB.L
GOLB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GOLB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


8PSG.DEGOLB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.74

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

4.50

-2.04

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the GOLB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSG.DE and GOLB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.21%, which is greater than GOLB.L's maximum drawdown of -41.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and GOLB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSG.DEGOLB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.21%

-41.27%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.00%

-33.20%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-33.20%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-39.87%

+17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-31.34%

+9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-18.97%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

12.90%

-3.42%

Volatility

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) is 7.99%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSG.DEGOLB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

16.89%

-8.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.34%

36.35%

-15.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.08%

44.62%

-11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

34.95%

-16.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.84%

43.94%

-22.10%

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

8PSG.DE vs. GOLB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSG.DE nor GOLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSG.DE and GOLB.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOLB.L.

8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while GOLB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 8PSG.DE and 0.65% for GOLB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSG.DE and GOLB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer