8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

8PSB.DE (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) and RM8U.DE (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - 8PSB.DE is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while RM8U.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 8PSB.DE returned 42.18%/yr vs 27.86%/yr for RM8U.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 8PSB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RM8U.DE.

Performance

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSB.DE achieves a -2.37% return, which is significantly lower than RM8U.DE's 2.70% return.

8PSB.DE

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: -2.37%
• 6M: 29.53%
• 1Y: 110.49%
• 3Y*: 42.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RM8U.DE

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 6.33%
• 1Y: 30.06%
• 3Y*: 27.86%
• 5Y*: 19.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
8PSB.DE Invesco Physical Silver ETC	-2.37%	130.25%	30.85%	-4.18%	10.64%	-7.65%
RM8U.DE HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC	2.70%	48.89%	34.03%	9.20%	6.98%	6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021	0.68

The correlation between 8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSB.DE

8PSB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 52
8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
8PSB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
8PSB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
8PSB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
8PSB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

RM8U.DE

RM8U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 36
RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RM8U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RM8U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RM8U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RM8U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	8PSB.DE	RM8U.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.30	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	1.75	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.81	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.09	4.58	+1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	8PSB.DE	RM8U.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	1.30	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.01	-0.33

Drawdowns

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than RM8U.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	8PSB.DE	RM8U.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.62%	-18.51%	-20.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.62%	-16.54%	-22.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.62%	-16.54%	-22.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.51%	-15.01%	-18.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.18%	-6.13%	-5.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.07%	6.55%	+11.52%

Volatility

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.36% compared to HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) at 5.04%. This indicates that 8PSB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RM8U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	8PSB.DE	RM8U.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.36%	5.04%	+11.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.95%	20.04%	+31.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.17%	23.03%	+35.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.63%	15.99%	+18.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.63%	16.17%	+18.46%

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RM8U.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

8PSB.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSB.DE nor RM8U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE in my portfolio?

8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 8PSB.DE or RM8U.DE?

On fees, 8PSB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 8PSB.DE or RM8U.DE?

8PSB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for RM8U.DE.

What is the main difference between 8PSB.DE and RM8U.DE?

8PSB.DE is categorized as Silver, while RM8U.DE is Precious Metals. 8PSB.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while RM8U.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for 8PSB.DE and 0.22% for RM8U.DE.