8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE
8PSB.DE (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) and FWEA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 8PSB.DE is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while FWEA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 8PSB.DE returned 110.49% vs 26.40% for FWEA.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 8PSB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FWEA.DE.
Performance
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 8PSB.DE achieves a -2.37% return, which is significantly lower than FWEA.DE's 10.64% return.
8PSB.DE
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 29.53%
- 1Y
- 110.49%
- 3Y*
- 42.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWEA.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 26.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
8PSB.DE Invesco Physical Silver ETC | -2.37% | 130.25% | 30.85% | 2.63% |
FWEA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 10.64% | 17.53% | 19.21% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between 8PSB.DE and FWEA.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | 0.26 |
The correlation between 8PSB.DE and FWEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
8PSB.DE
FWEA.DE
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 8PSB.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.18 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 13.52 | -7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 8PSB.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.30 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.51 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 8PSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than FWEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSB.DE and FWEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 8PSB.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.62% | -17.48% | -21.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.62% | -8.28% | -30.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.51% | -0.81% | -32.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -1.86% | -9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.07% | 1.95% | +16.12% |
Volatility
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.36% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) at 3.36%. This indicates that 8PSB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 8PSB.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.36% | 3.36% | +13.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.95% | 8.93% | +43.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.17% | 11.45% | +46.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 12.72% | +21.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 12.72% | +21.91% |
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
8PSB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FWEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
8PSB.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 8PSB.DE nor FWEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
8PSB.DE and FWEA.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 8PSB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
8PSB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FWEA.DE.
8PSB.DE is categorized as Silver, while FWEA.DE is Global Equities. 8PSB.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while FWEA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for 8PSB.DE and 0.20% for FWEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for 8PSB.DE and FWEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer