PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSB.DE achieves a -20.12% return, which is significantly lower than 8PSG.DE's -5.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with 8PSB.DE having a 11.06% annualized return and 8PSG.DE not far ahead at 11.21%.


8PSB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-20.61%
YTD
-20.12%
6M
-12.91%
1Y
67.59%
3Y*
31.35%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
11.06%

8PSG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.94%
YTD
-5.74%
6M
-6.86%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
8PSB.DE
Invesco Physical Silver ETC
-20.12%130.25%18.21%-0.84%4.98%-13.65%47.00%16.08%-9.66%3.44%
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
-5.74%48.98%44.76%0.00%8.62%3.81%12.94%20.91%2.90%-1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSB.DE and 8PSG.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.37

Over the past year, 8PSB.DE and 8PSG.DE have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSB.DE
8PSB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


8PSB.DE8PSG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.06

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

2.46

+0.84

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSB.DE and 8PSG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, which is greater than 8PSG.DE's maximum drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSB.DE and 8PSG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSB.DE8PSG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.19%

-54.21%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.60%

-22.00%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-22.00%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.60%

-22.00%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.60%

-22.00%

-23.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.60%

-22.00%

-23.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.66%

-23.97%

-29.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.48%

9.48%

+11.00%

Volatility

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.13% compared to Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) at 7.99%. This indicates that 8PSB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 8PSG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSB.DE8PSG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.13%

7.99%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.99%

21.34%

+31.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.75%

33.08%

+26.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.94%

18.49%

+17.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.10%

21.84%

+10.26%

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than 8PSG.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

8PSB.DE vs. 8PSG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSB.DE nor 8PSG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSB.DE and 8PSG.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for 8PSB.DE.

8PSB.DE is categorized as Silver, while 8PSG.DE is Gold. 8PSB.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while 8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for 8PSB.DE and 0.12% for 8PSG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSB.DE and 8PSG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer