PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF (8OUU.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8OUU.DE achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than XBAG.DE's 0.49% return.


8OUU.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.38%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
-1.04%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
10Y*

XBAG.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.49%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
0.24%
5Y*
-1.25%
10Y*
-0.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
8OUU.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF
0.38%-3.96%2.49%1.79%-7.74%
XBAG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
0.49%-3.89%3.40%1.86%-7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 8OUU.DE and XBAG.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022

0.89

The correlation between 8OUU.DE and XBAG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8OUU.DE
8OUU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
8OUU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAG.DE
XBAG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XBAG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF (8OUU.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


8OUU.DEXBAG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.99

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

-0.08

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

-0.16

-0.63

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8OUU.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the XBAG.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8OUU.DE and XBAG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


8OUU.DEXBAG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.05

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.27

-0.57

Drawdowns

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8OUU.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, smaller than the maximum XBAG.DE drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8OUU.DE and XBAG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8OUU.DEXBAG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-16.64%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-2.44%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.94%

-7.49%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.22%

-12.21%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-6.65%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.23%

+0.07%

Volatility

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF (8OUU.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE) have volatilities of 1.00% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8OUU.DEXBAG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.99%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

2.67%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.78%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

6.08%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.05%

5.92%

+0.13%

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

8OUU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

8OUU.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Dividend Comparison

8OUU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBAG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
8OUU.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBAG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
3.00%2.94%3.16%2.22%2.78%0.82%1.47%1.76%1.36%1.11%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, 8OUU.DE and XBAG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XBAG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for 8OUU.DE.

8OUU.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral, while XBAG.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 8OUU.DE and 0.10% for XBAG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8OUU.DE and XBAG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer