PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF (8OUU.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8OUU.DE achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than DBZB.DE's -0.71% return.


8OUU.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.38%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
-1.04%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
10Y*

DBZB.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
0.76%
5Y*
-2.54%
10Y*
-0.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
8OUU.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF
0.38%-3.96%2.49%1.79%-7.74%
DBZB.DE
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
-0.71%1.28%-0.41%3.56%-8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between 8OUU.DE and DBZB.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022

0.58

The correlation between 8OUU.DE and DBZB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8OUU.DE
8OUU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
8OUU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
8OUU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DBZB.DE
DBZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DBZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF (8OUU.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


8OUU.DEDBZB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.00

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

-0.01

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

-0.04

-0.76

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8OUU.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the DBZB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8OUU.DE and DBZB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


8OUU.DEDBZB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.01

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.22

-0.52

Drawdowns

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8OUU.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, smaller than the maximum DBZB.DE drawdown of -21.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8OUU.DE and DBZB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8OUU.DEDBZB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-21.88%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-3.52%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.94%

-5.14%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.22%

-16.44%

+7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-5.97%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.26%

+0.04%

Volatility

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF (8OUU.DE) is 1.00%, while Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that 8OUU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8OUU.DEDBZB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.48%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

3.06%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.86%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

5.37%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.05%

4.74%

+1.31%

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

8OUU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DBZB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

8OUU.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8OUU.DE nor DBZB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8OUU.DE and DBZB.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8OUU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8OUU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DBZB.DE.

8OUU.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral, while DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 8OUU.DE and 0.25% for DBZB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8OUU.DE and DBZB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer