7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE
7RIP.DE (HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF) and CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - 7RIP.DE tracks the Solactive Travel while CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 7RIP.DE returned 13.87%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for CEMG.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 7RIP.DE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEMG.DE.
Performance
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.DE's -7.03% return.
7RIP.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7RIP.DE HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | -2.92% | 5.32% | 33.59% | 26.46% | -14.00% | -9.48% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and CEMG.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and CEMG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
7RIP.DE
CEMG.DE
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 7RIP.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.91 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | -0.58 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | -1.23 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 7RIP.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | -0.64 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.22 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.DE drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and CEMG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 7RIP.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -33.94% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -14.05% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.05% | -20.18% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -18.75% | +12.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -12.26% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 6.68% | -0.38% |
Volatility
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that 7RIP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 7RIP.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 4.37% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 10.24% | +8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 12.88% | +10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 18.54% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 18.33% | +6.66% |
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
7RIP.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 7RIP.DE nor CEMG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
7RIP.DE and CEMG.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMG.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMG.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for 7RIP.DE.
7RIP.DE tracks Solactive Travel, while CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for 7RIP.DE and 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Find the right allocation for 7RIP.DE and CEMG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer