6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE
6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) and ZPA5.DE (Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while ZPA5.DE is a ESG fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 6AQQ.DE returned 28.19% vs 18.63% for ZPA5.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 6AQQ.DE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for ZPA5.DE.
Performance
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly higher than ZPA5.DE's 9.01% return.
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- 20.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.20%
ZPA5.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.60%
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 16.74% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 4.70% |
ZPA5.DE Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc | 9.01% | 2.76% | 34.10% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and ZPA5.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and ZPA5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank
6AQQ.DE
ZPA5.DE
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 6AQQ.DE | ZPA5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 0.91 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 1.65 | +6.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, which is greater than ZPA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and ZPA5.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 6AQQ.DE | ZPA5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -23.13% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -20.40% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -5.73% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -6.36% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 11.31% | -7.78% |
Volatility
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE) at 3.08%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 6AQQ.DE | ZPA5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 3.08% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 8.26% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 24.44% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 19.71% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 19.71% | +0.03% |
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPA5.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
6AQQ.DE vs. ZPA5.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 6AQQ.DE nor ZPA5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
6AQQ.DE and ZPA5.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPA5.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPA5.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZPA5.DE is ESG. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while ZPA5.DE tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG+ Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.07% for ZPA5.DE.
Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and ZPA5.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer