PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than SC0U.DE's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed SC0U.DE with an annualized return of 21.35%, while SC0U.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.32% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
2.51%
1M
1.82%
YTD
18.30%
6M
19.72%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
21.35%

SC0U.DE

1D
4.29%
1M
7.40%
YTD
8.50%
6M
14.36%
1Y
45.31%
3Y*
43.09%
5Y*
28.15%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
18.30%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.23%15.90%
SC0U.DE
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
8.50%79.97%32.49%25.93%-0.07%37.72%-22.62%15.49%-26.78%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and SC0U.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010

0.41

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and SC0U.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0U.DE
SC0U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SC0U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


6AQQ.DESC0U.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.57

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.43

8.44

+1.99

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SC0U.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and SC0U.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum SC0U.DE drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and SC0U.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DESC0U.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-60.69%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-16.70%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-19.82%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-29.85%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-56.61%

+25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

0.00%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-20.11%

+14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.10%

-1.66%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) is 5.37%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DESC0U.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

6.96%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

18.92%

-7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

23.11%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

23.71%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

25.59%

-5.92%

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0U.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 6AQQ.DE nor SC0U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


6AQQ.DE and SC0U.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0U.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0U.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SC0U.DE is Financials Equities. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while SC0U.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Banks. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.20% for SC0U.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and SC0U.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer