PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 21.35%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
2.51%
1M
1.82%
YTD
18.30%
6M
19.72%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
21.35%

MEUD.L

1D
1.67%
1M
4.73%
YTD
8.97%
6M
11.36%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
18.30%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.23%15.90%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
8.97%19.91%8.66%15.89%-9.94%24.68%-1.79%28.06%-10.71%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and MEUD.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2013

0.59

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


6AQQ.DEMEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

1.89

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.43

7.25

+3.18

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and MEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DEMEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-36.19%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-9.53%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-15.58%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-20.75%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-36.19%

+5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

0.00%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-7.56%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.49%

+0.95%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 3.52%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DEMEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

3.52%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

10.41%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

12.69%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

16.42%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

17.59%

+2.08%

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 6AQQ.DE nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


6AQQ.DE and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.15% for MEUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and MEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer