PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist (LGQI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 19.00% return, which is significantly higher than LGQI.DE's 12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed LGQI.DE with an annualized return of 21.78%, while LGQI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.45% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.10%
YTD
19.00%
6M
19.07%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
21.78%

LGQI.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
1.96%
YTD
12.96%
6M
13.57%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
19.00%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.23%15.90%
LGQI.DE
Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist
12.96%9.73%15.24%5.20%1.74%20.03%-11.62%20.30%-6.25%2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and LGQI.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012

0.52

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and LGQI.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

LGQI.DE
LGQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LGQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LGQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist (LGQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


6AQQ.DELGQI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

4.11

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

11.72

-1.49

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the LGQI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and LGQI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum LGQI.DE drawdown of -33.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and LGQI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DELGQI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-33.28%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-5.17%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-11.51%

-15.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-13.08%

-18.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-33.28%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

0.00%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-4.58%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.82%

+1.63%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist (LGQI.DE) at 2.84%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DELGQI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

2.84%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

7.45%

+4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

9.57%

+6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

10.62%

+9.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

12.28%

+7.41%

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than LGQI.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Dividend Comparison

6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LGQI.DE
Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist
3.01%3.40%4.18%4.56%5.04%3.60%4.16%4.52%4.72%4.16%4.06%4.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


6AQQ.DE and LGQI.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LGQI.DE.

6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LGQI.DE is Global Equity Income. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while LGQI.DE tracks SG Global Quality Income Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.45% for LGQI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and LGQI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer