PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Retail UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH8.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than EXH8.DE's -1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed EXH8.DE with an annualized return of 21.42%, while EXH8.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
7.97%
YTD
20.65%
6M
18.79%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
21.42%

EXH8.DE

1D
0.97%
1M
4.30%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.34%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
6.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
20.65%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.22%15.90%
EXH8.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Retail UCITS ETF (DE)
-1.84%13.47%10.93%36.87%-30.57%13.16%9.68%38.72%-9.61%-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and EXH8.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.51

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and EXH8.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EXH8.DE
EXH8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EXH8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXH8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXH8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EXH8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXH8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Retail UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


6AQQ.DEEXH8.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.07

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

0.48

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

1.09

+10.07

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the EXH8.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and EXH8.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


6AQQ.DEEXH8.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

0.33

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.09

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

0.32

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.30

+0.78

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum EXH8.DE drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and EXH8.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DEEXH8.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-54.89%

+23.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-12.96%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-19.54%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-48.60%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-48.60%

+17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-3.99%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-16.64%

+11.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

5.67%

-2.28%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) is 4.40%, while iShares STOXX Europe 600 Retail UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH8.DE) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXH8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DEEXH8.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

6.03%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

15.20%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

18.59%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.83%

21.53%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

19.73%

-0.10%

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EXH8.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. EXH8.DE - Dividend Comparison

6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXH8.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXH8.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Retail UCITS ETF (DE)
2.13%2.30%2.40%2.34%3.25%1.04%1.26%2.10%3.20%2.91%2.88%3.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


6AQQ.DE and EXH8.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXH8.DE.

6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EXH8.DE is Consumer Staples Equities. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while EXH8.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Retail. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.46% for EXH8.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and EXH8.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer