6078.HK vs. ^HSI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

6078.HK (Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co Ltd) is a stock, while ^HSI (Hang Seng Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, 6078.HK returned -35.43%/yr vs -2.67%/yr for ^HSI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

6078.HK vs. ^HSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co Ltd (6078.HK) and Hang Seng Index (^HSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6078.HK achieves a -24.48% return, which is significantly lower than ^HSI's -1.47% return.

6078.HK

• 1D: -4.29%
• 1M: -18.86%
• YTD: -24.48%
• 6M: -22.67%
• 1Y: -40.33%
• 3Y*: -42.12%
• 5Y*: -35.43%
• 10Y*: —

^HSI

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -1.47%
• 6M: -2.63%
• 1Y: 6.76%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: -2.67%
• 10Y*: 1.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6078.HK vs. ^HSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
6078.HK Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co Ltd	-24.48%	-12.90%	-59.60%	-36.72%	14.75%	0.14%	87.69%
^HSI Hang Seng Index	-1.47%	27.77%	17.67%	-13.82%	-15.46%	-14.08%	12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between 6078.HK and ^HSI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020	0.53

The correlation between 6078.HK and ^HSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

6078.HK vs. ^HSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6078.HK

6078.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
6078.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
6078.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
6078.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 5
6078.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
6078.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4

^HSI

^HSI Risk / Return Rank: 27
^HSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
^HSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
^HSI Omega Ratio Rank: 25
^HSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
^HSI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6078.HK vs. ^HSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co Ltd (6078.HK) and Hang Seng Index (^HSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	6078.HK	^HSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	0.37	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	0.67	-2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.07	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	0.54	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.58	1.35	-2.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

6078.HK vs. ^HSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6078.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the ^HSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6078.HK and ^HSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	6078.HK	^HSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.24	0.37	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.56	-0.11	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	0.27	-0.51

Drawdowns

6078.HK vs. ^HSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6078.HK drawdown since its inception was -91.29%, which is greater than ^HSI's maximum drawdown of -65.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6078.HK and ^HSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	6078.HK	^HSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.29%	-65.18%	-26.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.83%	-12.82%	-35.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.52%	-25.49%	-56.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.29%	-49.85%	-41.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.29%	-23.83%	-67.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.03%	-24.17%	-33.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.84%	5.09%	+20.75%

Volatility

6078.HK vs. ^HSI - Volatility Comparison

Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co Ltd (6078.HK) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Hang Seng Index (^HSI) at 5.18%. This indicates that 6078.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^HSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	6078.HK	^HSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.92%	5.18%	+3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.10%	13.70%	+9.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.35%	18.52%	+14.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.51%	25.32%	+39.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.32%	21.96%	+43.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 6078.HK and ^HSI in my portfolio?

6078.HK and ^HSI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.